
Meng-Tsung Su Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Tunghai University
Hui-Fang Liu Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Development, University of Taipei
Eric Chen Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Chung Yuan Christian University
You-Cheng Luo Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Design, Chinese Culture University
Hsin-Ko Yu Ph.D. Candidate in Urbanism, College of Architecture, TU Delft
Winsing Art Place (No. 6, Lane 10, Lane 180, Section 6, Section 6, Minquan East Road, Neihu District, Taipei City)
Free admission, advance registration is required ($150 is available at the on-site bookstore with discounts on books and drinks)
“The People vs. The World of Tomorrow” lecture series is extended from a late-night reading session for selected books at Winsing Art Place. Launched by the Winsing Arts Foundation, Hui-Fang Liu, Assistant Professor from the Department of Urban Development at the University of Taipei, invited experts in architecture to submit, share, and talk about their favorite theoretical works in the fields of landscape, cities, architecture, and more. Unlike previous discussions of pure architecture, we look at cities, buildings, and public spaces from a more diverse perspective, discussing concepts such as “urbanism,” “commonality,” “publicness,” and “future cities” in the books. The first session will feature an introduction to Wild and the City. Landscape Architecture for Lush Urbanism by Professor Meng-Tsung Su.
Wild and the City. Landscape Architecture for Lush Urbanism is co-edited by Italian scholars Annalisa Metta and Maria Livia Olivetti. Wildness manifests in cities for various reasons—sometimes due to neglect, other times intentionally. We have gradually established a reciprocal relationship with what post-industrial society calls “nature.” Undisturbed ecosystems and wildlife are becoming increasingly common in contemporary European cities. Untamed territories are expanding, housing animals and insects that threaten us, invasive species disrupting native flora, while dense jungles take over parks and the rooftops and facades of the most fashionable buildings. In this context, wilderness can be harnessed by designers to address diverse challenges: regenerating abandoned areas, creating sustainable infrastructure, revitalizing valuable public spaces, improving the ecological footprint of new settlements, proposing new practices and social rituals, responding to climate change, meeting human needs, and satisfying residents’ “longing for nature.”
This book critically examines clues within the current relationship between “wilderness” and “city.” On the one hand, it explores the positive value of wild landscapes in enhancing urban quality through aesthetics, health, and livability. On the other hand, it questions the risks of wilderness as a buzzword that may fuel anti-urban stances or cheap greenwashing policies. It aims to interpret the diverse readings evoked by urban wilderness, which continue to find their distinguishing elements within the unstable relationship between city and nature.
"The people" refers to the populace and is also a play on words combining "pro" (professional) and the masses1. "The World of Tomorrow" often represents the evil empire in movies or books, or a dystopia where ideals have crumbled. The term "vs." implies a decisive battle from a contemplative attitude. Regardless of one's professional background, setting out from the thoughts on the future, the first book brings us into the discussion of urban landscapes. Wilderness (or wildness) and cities correspond to nature and humanity; urban nature can either be a deliberate aesthetic arrangement by planners or a spontaneously developed presence in the metropolis. Over the past twenty years, there have been many attempts to let wilderness and cities coexist, such as Gilles Clément's 2004 publication Manifeste du Tiers Paysage (The Third Landscape Manifesto)2, which advocates for "designing without designing" and emulating nature's self-regulation.
The book also points out that our belief in controlling nature is a serious misconception. Designers should “learn to do nothing," refrain from solving all problems with rationality, and allow users to define the space themselves. It is also important to convince the public that "useless things are actually useful," because when a space is entirely filled with functions, there is no flexible open space left. Thus a question arises: to what extent can we (or people) accept "wilderness"? Commentator Meng-Tsung Su responds, "Our many imaginations of wilderness are, in fact, romanticizing nature by modern industrial civilization. In the 21st century, all languages and values are being replaced. When old language categories are replaced, we might slowly begin to accept what wilderness will look like."